The relationship between demographic parameters and optic disc findings in neuro‑ophthalmic patients in Port Harcourt, Nigeria: Initial report
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Neuro-Ophthalmology subspecialty is a newly established Unit at the Eye Department of University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. There are hardly any data on neuro-ophthalmic conditions in our environment, so this study will provide the much needed baseline data for future reference.
Aim: This is an initial report to identify the spectrum of optic disc findings and determine their relationship with demographic characteristics (age and gender) of patients seen at the Neuro-ophthalmology Clinic of University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital.
Methodology: This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study with minimum sample size calculated using the formula for cross-sectional studies.7 Using the 95% level of significance, estimated proportion of 0.5, level of precision of 0.10 and non-response rate of 80%; a sample size of 133 was appropriate for the index study. One hundred and thirty three case notes with complete records were retrieved and data extracted on age, sex, presenting symptoms and signs, visual acuity, fundus findings, investigation results, diagnosis and treatment. Data was analyzed with SPSS version 20 and a p-value of 0.05 considered significant.
Results: There were 133 patients with a mean age of 37.50±17.51. There were 70 males and 63 females. Most patients had disc pallor - constituting 51.8%; others were disc edema (3.8%), papilledema (3.8%), hyperemia and perivascular sheathing. Fifty-two patients (39.1%) however had normal discs. Disc pallor (64.4%) and temporal disc pallor (66.7%) were commoner in males; but papilledema was commoner in females (80%). These differences were statistically significant (p=0.048).
Conclusion: Optic disc findings in neuro-ophthalmic patients this study shows that disc pallor was associated more with the male gender while papilledema was commoner in females.
Downloads
Article Details
The journal grants the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal non-commercial use under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
References
1. Rose FC. Optic atrophy. Postgrad Med J 1964;40:692‑5.
2. Singh D, Saxena R, Sharma P, Menon V. Preferred practice pattern: Systematic approach to a case of disc pallor. Delhi J Ophthalmol 2011;21:28-32.
3. Lee AG, Chau FY, Golnik KC, Kardon RH, Wall M. The diagnostic yield of the evaluation for isolated unexplained optic atrophy. Ophthalmology 2005;112:757‑9.
4. NaiduAP, Satya SrinivasV. Aclinical study of optic atrophy‑its etiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, management and outcome. J Evid
Based Med Healthc 2015;2:8283‑7.
5. Chen JJ, Costello F, KardonRH. Sex disparities in neuro‑ophthalmologic disorders. Curr Eye Res 2015;40:247‑65.
6. Mansoui AM, Hamed LM. Racial variation of optic nerve disease. Neuro Ophthalmol 1991;11:319‑23.
7. Durcan FJ, Corbett JJ, Wall M. The incidence of pseudotumor cerebri. Population studies in Iowa and Louisiana. Arch Neurol 1988;45:875‑7.
8. Kling F, Cochener B, Colin J. Bilateral papilledema in young women: Two case reports of benign intracranial hypertension? J Fr Ophtalmol
2002;25:835‑9.
9. Pilat AV, Gottlob I, Sheth V, Thomas MG, Proudlock FA. Gender‑ and ethnicity‑related differences in optic nerve head topography in healthy Indian and Caucasian participants. Neuroophthalmology 2014;38:205‑12.
10. Schwartz B, Reinstein NM, Lieberman DM. Pallor of the optic disc. Quantitative photographic evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 1973;89:278‑86.