Qualitative views on episiotomy amongst accouchers and pregnant women in a tertiary hospital in Southern Nigeria
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: In 2018, the World Health Organization recommended the restrictive use of episiotomy by midwives and obstetricians on pregnant women undergoing vaginal birth. Unfortunately, the use of episiotomy is still fairly common in Africa.
Aim: We examined the qualitative views on episiotomy amongst accouchers and pregnant women at the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital in southern Nigeria.
Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed. Census sampling was used to enrol 19 accouchers(house officer doctors = 7 and nurse-midwives = 12) and 43 third-trimester pregnant women. Narrative data were collected through focused group discussion using an interview guide and a digital audio recorder. Collected data were transcribed and subjected to coding, content and thematic analysis to enable categorisation of themes.
Results: Respondents were 22–46 years old. The accouchers mentioned several indications for episiotomy which were not consistent with current evidence in literature. In contrast to pregnant women’s views, the accouchers reported that episiotomy is a clinician’s choice, so pre-informing the pregnant woman about it is optional. Pregnant women were of the view that they should be more involved by being the ones to decide whether they want to receive episiotomy or not. Even when the accouchers viewed episiotomy as having some clinical uses, the pregnant women suggested that episiotomy should be banned.
Conclusion: The views of the accouchers and pregnant women were not totally aligned with each other. More sensitisation of accouchers and pregnant women is required to ensure re-alignment of views based on available evidence.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal grants the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal non-commercial use under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
References
1. Kartal B, Kızılırmak A, Calpbinici P, Demir G. Retrospective analysis of episiotomy prevalence. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2017;18:190‑4.
2. Bohren MA, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, Maung TM, Balde MD, Maya E, et al. How women are treated during facility‑based childbirth in four
countries: A cross‑sectional study with labour observations and community‑based surveys. Lancet 2019;394:1750‑63.
3. Ali‑Masri HY, Hassan SJ, Zimmo KM, Zimmo MW, Ismail KMK, Fosse E, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of episiotomy incision in a governmental maternity unit in Palestine: An observational study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2018;2018:6345497.
4. Muraca GM, Liu S, Sabr Y, Lisonkova S, Skoll A, Brant R, et al. Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: A population‑based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ 2019;191:E1149‑E1158.
5. Khresheh R, Barclay L. Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy practice among obstetricians and midwives in Jordan. Women Birth 2020;33:e176‑e181.
6. Masuda C, Ferolin SK, Masuda K, Smith C, Matsui M. Evidence‑based intrapartum practice and its associated factors at a tertiary teaching
hospital in the Philippines, a descriptive mixed‑methods study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:78.
7. Goueslard K, Cottenet J, Roussot A, Clesse C, Sagot P, Quantin C, et al. How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population‑based
study in France. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:208.
8. Clesse C, Lighezzolo‑Alnot J, De Lavergne S, Hamlin S, Scheffler M. Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: Comparative systematic
review of changing practices. Health Care Women Int 2018;39:644‑62.
9. Ononuju CN, Ogu RN, Nyengidiki TK, Onwubuariri MI, Amadi SC, Ezeaku EC, et al. Review of episiotomy and the effect of its risk factors on postepisiotomy complications at the university of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Niger Med J 2020;61:96‑101.
10. Voon ST, Lay JTS, San WTW, Shorey S, Lin SKS. Comparison of midwife‑led care and obstetrician‑led care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in Singapore: A retrospective cohort study. Midwifery 2017;53:71‑9.
11. Rodriguez MI, Seuc A, Say L, Hindin MJ. Episiotomy and obstetric outcomes among women living with type 3 female genital mutilation:
A secondary analysis. Reprod Health 2016;13:131.
12. Amorim MM, Coutinho IC, Melo I, Katz L. Selective episiotomy versus implementation of a non‑episiotomy protocol: A randomized clinical
trial. Reprod Health 2017;14:55.
13. Worku SA, Mitku YM, Getahun SA. Episiotomy practice and its associated factor among women who gave birth at public health institutions of Akaki Kality in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Clin Mother Child Health 2019;16:318.
14. World Health Organization. WHO recommendation on episiotomy policy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
15. Nassar AH, Visser GH, Ayres‑de‑Campos D, Rane A, Gupta S, FIGO Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee. FIGO statement:
Restrictive use rather than routine use of episiotomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019;146:17‑9.
16. Garba I, Ozegya MS, Abubakar IS, Ayyuba R. Episiotomy at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria: A 3‑year review. Arch Int Surg 2016;6:17‑21.
17. Al‑Ghammari K, Al‑Riyami Z, Al‑Moqbali M, Al‑Marjabi F, Al‑Mahrouqi B, Al‑Khatri A, et al. Predictors of routine episiotomy in primigravida women in oman. Appl Nurs Res 2016;29:131‑5.
18. Prapawichar P, Juntaruksa P. Women’s involvement in decision making: Episiotomy procedure. J Anesthesiol 2017; 5:42‑5.
19. Kaddoura R, DeJong J, Zurayk H, Kabakian T, Abbyad C, Mirza FG, et al. Episiotomy practice in the Middle East: A Lebanese teaching tertiary care centre experience. Women Birth 2019;32:e223‑e228.
20. Abubakar M, Suleiman M. Perception of episiotomy among pregnant women in Kano, North‑Western Nigeria. Niger J Basic Clin Sci 2015;12: 25‑29.
21. Oluwasola TA, Bello FA. Knowledge and perception of pregnant women to episiotomy in Ibadan. J Basic Clin Reprod Sci 2017;6:64‑8.